Global Opinion Theory and the English School of International Relations
In: New global studies, Band 4, Heft 2
ISSN: 1940-0004
1893117 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: New global studies, Band 4, Heft 2
ISSN: 1940-0004
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 329-352
ISSN: 0305-8298
IN RECENT YEARS A NUMBER OF AUTHORS HAVE DRAWN ATTENTION TO THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN REGIME THEORY AND THE ENGLISH SCHOOL. IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT SOME KIND OF SYNTHESIS BETWEEN THE TWO SCHOOLS MAY BE BOTH POSSIBLE AND DESIRABLE. THIS ESSAY OUTLINES THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THEM WITH AN EYE TOWARDS IDENTIFYING WHAT SUCH A SYNTHESIS MIGHT INVOLVE.
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 329
ISSN: 0305-8298
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 329-351
ISSN: 1477-9021
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"The English School of International Relations: Historical Development" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Korean Journal of International Relations, Band 62, Heft 2, S. 7-65
ISSN: 2713-6868
In: Journal of international political theory: JIPT, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 242-250
ISSN: 1755-1722
This article responds to Charlotta Friedner Parrat's critique of our argument that the English School of international relations should embrace a more thoroughgoing interpretivism. We address four of Friedner Parrat's objections to our argument: that our distinction between structuralism and interpretivism is too stark; that our understanding of the relationship between agency and structure is problematic; that our approach would confine the English School to the study of intellectual history; and that the English School should eschew explanation. We argue that if the School is to use structuralism, it must be clearer about how it understands structures and their relationships to agents. We argue too that interpretivism not only offers a better account of situated agency, but also that it provides the English School with one way to move beyond the description and classification of institutions in international society towards better explanations of international relations.
In: Palgrave Studies in International Relations
World Affairs Online
In: Meždunarodnye processy: žurnal teorii meždunarodnych otnošenij i mirovoj politiki = International trends : journal of theory of international relations and world politics, Band 14, Heft 3 (46), S. 68-80
In: International Society and its Critics, S. 29-43
In: Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta: naučno-teoretičeskij žurnal = Science journal of Volgograd State University. Serija 4, Istorija, regionovedenie, meždunarodnye otnošenija = History. Area studies. International relations, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 151-161
ISSN: 2312-8704
This article is devoted to English historian F.S. Northedge (1918-1985) and his role in the development conception of international society and English School of International relations in 1960-1980.
This school consists of small group of scientists and diplomats, who were well educated in elite British universities like Cambridge and Oxford. They were acquainted with each other personally. British Committee for the Theory of International Politics in 1960-1970 was the center for the study of International Society. Such composition of the school demonstrated aristocratic character of the International relations study as intellectual pursuit in United Kingdom. Meanwhile, such people like Charles Manning, Fred Northedge, Edward Carr and some other famous people, who usually were English School members, did not taken part in the British Committee due to different reasons.
Thus, F.S. Northedge was untypical participant of English school and his scientific heritage need to be studied. Key factors of his biography and his views on International Policy are studies in the article. "Diplomatic style", "System of the state" and "International society" were the central concepts in his works. He met with these ideas in the London School of economy, where Charles Manning, Martin Wight and Headley Bull – founders of English School - had worked at International relations chair in different time. The analysis of these categories let make conclusion that F. Northedge agreed with main ideas of English School of International relations. But at the same time he understood them very originally. His system of the views demonstrated that British Committee for the Theory of International Politics, but not London School of economy, was the main center for the development conception of International Society in 1960-1980.
In: International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, Band 14, Heft 3 (46), S. 68-80
In: Cambridge studies in international relations 102
What is the English School of International Relations and why is there increasing interest in it? Linklater and Suganami provide a comprehensive account of this distinctive approach to the study of world politics which highlights coexistence and cooperation, as well as conflict, in the relations between sovereign states. In the first book-length volume of its kind, the authors present a comprehensive discussion of the rise and development of the English School, its principal research agenda, and its epistemological and methodological foundations. The authors further consider the English School's position on progress in world politics, its relationship with Kantian thought, its conception of a sociology of states-systems and its approach to good international citizenship as a means of reducing harm in world politics. Lucidly written and unprecedented in its coverage, this book is essential reading for anyone interested in international relations and politics worldwide
In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 447
In: International studies review, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 171-197
ISSN: 1521-9488
World Affairs Online